After last
weekend’s trouble at Urawa v Shimizu I found myself, against my better judgment
but with morbid fascination, sucked in to YouTube’s comments section. While it
was the inevitable car crash of bitching and name calling, I also picked up on
a recurring theme of discussion. It was at once fascinating but ultimately disturbing.
A number of comments sympathising with the Urawa cause, while predictably
attempting to shift the blame, were at the same time suggesting Shimizu
supporters not only caused the initial exchanges, but actively ensured their
escalation.
To recap,
shortly after S-Pulse’s traditional post game celebration, several Urawa fans
arrived next to the away enclosure shouting, gesturing and demanding an end to
the festivities. In response, a chorus of Kingdom
Shimizu rang out. After the majority of S-Pulse fans had left the ground,
150 home fans blocked a remaining group of fifty in the stadium for over four
hours. The reason given in holding these people captive, one frequently repeated
online since, is that S-Pulse supporters were “unreasonably happy” in their
celebrations and as such failed to respect the home team.
No, you
read that correctly. Unreasonably happy
and failing to respect the home team. Perhaps the home supporters are uniquely
thin skinned, but the travelling support did nothing most normal people would
consider as a display of disrespect. Two different chants were sung, neither
mentioning Urawa. The first, the regular post win victory dance, the second Kingdom Shimizu. Kingdom Shimizu is a song which gets an airing after beating Urawa,
an area traditionally rivals when claiming the heart of Japanese football, or
local rivals Jubilo Iwata.
Genuinely showing
disrespect could have taken the form of obscene messages aimed at the home team
(as Kashima once did against Urawa), damaging the home team’s flags (as Urawa
once did at Nihondaira), or taking the singing outside the stadium. Any of
these would have been an act of aggression, but none of these were the case. In
approaching a jubilant away end demanding silence, was there ever going be an outcome
other than heckling and a second rendition of Kingdom Shimizu? Not on this planet. The travelling hoards acted as
any football fans should, and a minority of home fans had a temper tantrum.
Returning
to the argument levelled at to Shimizu fans, if you follow that particular
logic it leads us on to some very shaky ground. Home fans blockaded the away
zone because they were unhappy, firstly with the away fans’ delight at victory,
and subsequently at their refusal to be quiet. Pretty spurious grounds by which
to forcibly restrict people going home you may think, and you would be right,
but who was there to stop them? Nobody. For four hours the issue went
unresolved. No police presence was brought in to remove the law breakers and
free those trapped.
What
possible reasoning there was for not requesting police assistance I don’t even
want to begin to speculate. But in not confronting the aggressors you can be
certain they will repeat their actions, confidence bolstered. Next time who
knows what ever-more flimsy provocation they’ll cite as justification? “How dare
the away area keep not quiet during our team announcement?” “Who do they think
they are beating us is in such an important game?”
The reality
is you can’t put any restrictions on any
supporters’ freedom, and if you try to you can kiss all atmosphere
goodbye. Violent or genuinely inciteful behaviour aside, booing, cheering, making a row over the home
fans, and most of all NOT shutting up just because your opponents may have hurt
feelings are essential to any free and fair football stadium. If after victory
Urawa decided to mimic S-Pulse’s victory song I’d say fair play, you’ve earned
your moment, enjoy it as it’s your right, rubbing our faces in it as you see
fit. There is nothing else you can
say.
The actions
of those on Saturday were juvenile in the first instance, but doubly perverse
has been the attempts to justify them through ambiguous and loaded, but
ultimately meaningless, language such as respect
and offence. That the police didn’t disperse
the wrongdoers validates mob rule as a method of crowd regulation, and unless
the J. League, still silent on the issue a week on, come down on the
ringleaders, not only will the door be thrown wide open for repeats, but a
standard will have been established: Our stadium, our rules. Do as we say or accept
the consequences. That is, in effect, anarchy, and obviously not a route the J.
League wants to start down.
You can't take the effect and make it the cause.
You can't take the effect and make it the cause.
1 comment:
It seems the league doesn't want to take actions against the stadium they picked to host the 20th anniversary game...
By the way, Niigata, who do you think you are, beating us at our stadium ?! You don't respect our team !
Post a Comment